Origen seems to me one of the most wobbly church fathers, sometimes producing great insight and sometimes getting out into the weeds pretty deeply. Followers of his seem to have believed that the Father had an anthropomorphic body, and that the souls of humans existed before creation (both sounding weirdly Mormon actually), but he's also sometimes really insightful.

The thing in this article that strikes me is the assertion that Christ died according to the flesh. I'm pretty sure that He died completely for us. God cannot die, and yet on the cross God died. If only a man died on the cross, we are not saved. If a man did not die on the cross, we are not saved. I'd have expected a little commentary on that particular point in Origen's wobbly work, as it seems very instructive floor Christology today: don't divide the person of Christ.