The Failure of the Idol of Science

An earthquake in Lisbon

by Ned Moerbe

In 1755, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake struck off the coast of Lisbon, Portugal, on All Saints’ Day, terrorizing the city of 250,000. Churches were full when the first tremor struck. Many perished in collapsing churches. Fires broke out across the city and were fed by strange and howling winds. Many people fled to the harbor hoping to escape on ships, only to see the harbor sucked dry before a monstrous wall of water devastated the city. It is estimated that up to 60,000 people died in the disaster.[1]

The Lisbon earthquake was a turning point in the thinking of Western civilization. Prominent Enlightenment thinkers such as Voltaire questioned how God could allow such a tragedy. People questioned whether or not God was good and almighty if He let such horrific things happen. Philosophers and skeptics demanded that God justify Himself to them.

In the end, Western thinkers found God’s answer in the cross of Christ to be insufficient, and they sought out a new deity: Science. She was held up as more worthy of worship. Science is a cruel mistress, no doubt. She is cold and heartless, but she is also objective and impartial, if not fair. For many, these qualities make her a more desirable deity than one who calls us to deny ourselves, take up our cross and daily die to this world.

The religion of Science

COVID-19 is revealing just how deeply rooted the idol of Science is in our modern worldview. Science is the religion of our day. Even Christians succumb to the temptation to look first to Science for answers to our questions and for help in our time of need. Science entices us with the same allurement that was in the garden. All our needs can be met through Science, or so her prophets claim. Not only can we create paradise, but we can have all knowledge. Thus, the scientist is not just priest in this religion, but he shares something of the goddess. If a scientist says it, it must be true. We look to Science to increase our understanding, to lengthen our lives and lead us to a better life in a better world.

This pandemic is also revealing the unreliability of our idol. We sit in our homes and gripe that Science has not relieved us from our plight. We complain that we aren’t able to get out of the house, that self-isolation is unnecessary and harming the economy. Or we complain that reopening the country too soon will cause more people to die. We complain that first we were told masks don’t help, then that we should wear them to protect others. We were told there is no treatment, then that hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were the cure we were looking for, while other doctors said the evidence wasn’t clear.

These angry complaints and protests are targeted at various civil and medical leaders, but their root lies in the assumption that whatever our god is, we deserve better from it. The difference between the world before 1755 and today is that prior to the Lisbon quake, man responded to experienced trials and suffering by asking which sin of his or his neighbor brought about this punishment. Christ tells His disciples not to look at affliction as a sign of greater or lesser guilt (e.g., John 9). Yet, He also says that every time we see devastation befall someone, we should repent (Luke 13:1–5). Today, instead of repenting, we assume that we are in the right. Others have failed us. We don’t deserve this. There have been calls for a national day of prayer to end this affliction, but where has been the cry for a national day of repentance?

Could it be that pleas for repentance are unheard today because at heart we are all devotees of Science, and Science doesn’t care about righteousness, sin or guilt? This is the paradox of our mindset. We have insisted that our origin is in chance, chaos and death, yet we also insist that there must be justice and order in the world.

The unreliability of Science

Is not the real source of our frustration in this pandemic that our new goddess is proving unreliable? Science was supposed to lead us with infallible facts. She attracted our devotion with the promise that with her leading, we could accomplish anything. Like all lies, there is a bit of truth in this enticement. Our knowledge of microbiology has drastically altered the way we view and treat viruses. But we want a cure now! If Science is our goddess, if she is the source of all knowledge and power, why can’t she give us what we want when we want it?

Once again, we find ourselves following a god who doesn’t give us what we expect. Science has failed us as an alternative to the God made known in His Son’s obedient death on the cross. She does not provide answers quickly enough. She cannot be relied on when it counts. She is supposed to be cold and objective, nothing but the facts, yet the facts seem to change. Newton’s physics was replaced by relativity, which is being replaced by quantum physics. We get mad at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for changing advice on masks, for revising statements on how COVID-19 is spread and how many people are expected to be infected, hospitalized or die. In reality, we do not have a problem with the CDC; we have a problem with Science. Science has failed us.

COVID-19 probably won’t be the Lisbon moment that demolishes the idolatry of the Enlightenment. Collectively, we don’t have the honesty or the memory for that to happen. But God willing, we can be led as individuals to recognize our own idolatry. We have trusted in Science, which in turn has led us to expect our political leaders to handle crises with infallibility. We have looked to the stock market as our highest good.

Science offered heaven on earth. In reality, it offers a life that is merely a step up from what we know now. Scripture offers us perfection in the life to come. But that is not all, nor is that the chief thing. Salvation is not about the easy life, but life with Christ. The malefactor on the cross received a greater promise than paradise when Jesus promised, “You will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43, emphasis added).

Too much for us

This pandemic is too much for us. But life before the pandemic was too much for us. Jesus never promised an end to our struggles in this life. He promised to be with us in these struggles. He was with the Christians crushed by rubble in the crumbling churches of Lisbon. He is with us in our current struggles. We know this because He took up His cross and led the way through suffering and death. While it is proper to save lives and keep the economy going, our ultimate goal is to be with Jesus.

There is an important place for science in our society. But she makes a lousy god. Researchers, doctors and civil leaders can help us make reasonable judgments about how to best love and serve our neighbor. There will be missteps. We will probably find that we could have done things differently and gotten a better result. There will certainly continue to be some Monday morning quarterbacking going on as we move through this crisis. But there is great freedom in knowing that we are not charged with getting everything right. Christ is the One who makes all things new and perfect. With this knowledge we can go forth in love, not fear, and take up our cross and follow Jesus, trusting that He is with us now and in eternity. He is just and the justifier of the ungodly. That will never make sense to our fallen minds, nor do we need it to.

The Rev. Ned Moerbe serves Trinity Lutheran Church, Blackwell, Okla.

[1] This account of the Lisbon earthquake is summarized from Thomas G. Long’s description in What Shall We Say?: Evil, Suffering, and the Crisis of Faith (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011).

9 thoughts on “The Failure of the Idol of Science”

  1. Christopher Eaker

    “Science doesn’t care about righteousness, sin or guilt…”

    Correct. It only cares about evidence. And because of evidence, I left the small-minded world of Christianity, which is demonstrated perfectly in this stupid little article.

  2. I appreciated this article. I found it because I was searching this exact issue. This was written a year ago, and now with the “vaccine” I recognize this as an issue. The divide between where people stand is growing. It seems clear to me, for many their hope is in a vaccine to bringing about normalcy or what they think is normal. If you don’t agree and choose to decline it – you are labelled the problem. God is sovereign and it is our hope in Him that surpasses our understanding and has already saved us (if we are born again)- that is why we must check ourselves regularly to see if we are putting our hope/worship in something else.

  3. Thanks Ned for having the boldness to write this against the most popular idol.

    “Claiming to be wise, we have become fools, and exchanged the glory of God for images resembling mortal man…”

    Read the rest of Romans 1 to see the symptoms and judgement for this and other idolatries – that even the church needs to repent from.

    Read the Old Testament to see how idolatry leads to enslavement and bondage.

    Let’s repent and perhaps God will relent.

    Also to those confused by the article, worshipping science as a god is the sin -not being a scientist. Even good things can be made idols in the hands of sinners.

  4. I appreciate the above comments. I do not think that the author has made the case that Science is a dangerous idol. Many of the statements made don’t reflect scientific thought accurately. There are questions that science can answer, though in science we hold some of those answers loosely enough to realize that additional information may change the answer a little or a lot. Articles like this, in my opinion, further the manufactured antagonism between science and faith. I believe one could encourage believers to put our Hope in the Risen Christ, without disparaging the good work done by scientists over the centuries.

  5. This is very distressing to me and makes me feel unwelcome in the LCMS. There’s one small sentence of “science can be good” but it seems most of the article implies you either need to choose to believe science or God. I am a veterinarian – a scientist. I can pray for the best outcome in my patients but that doesn’t mean I won’t use medications and vaccinations indicated by science to help and protect my patients. I trust my doctor to know how to take care of me when I’m sick but that doesn’t mean I don’t know who the true Healer is. I do not expect perfection or everything to go right, as this article claims the “scientist” does. God has given us minds and capability to discover the wonders of his creation. This is what science is – exploring and understanding the world around us. Coronavirus is present for one reason… sin is a part of this world. It is not related to scientific advancements. So then I ask: Why science? What about the idol of money? athletics? materialism? politics? religion? Anything can be an idol. Why isolate science? Why isolate me and make it seem like my scientific self and mind, with which God has blessed me, is wrong?

    1. Jessica,

      Thank you for your comments and concerns. Pr. Moerbe is addressing the idolatry of science. As you note, we can make idols of everything. We can make idols of politics, materialism, athletics. He didn’t address those idols as he was specifically addressing science. There is a proper place for science, but when we “fear, love, and trust” in science above God, it has become an idol that needs to be uprooted and removed. That’s Pr. Moerbe’s primary point in writing this article.

      1. While I am not a scientist, like Jessica, I walked away from this article thinking that the LCMS has it out for science. The ability scientists have to think about creation and humanity is a gift, and when used well, these individuals are gifts to everyone in the world- including the LCMS. Pastor Moerbe’s primary point was not clearly made. Many doctors are faithful members, and generous supporters of many LCMS churches and missions. Perhaps it would do Pastor Moerbe well to retract/rewrite this article, or apologize for the harm he has caused Jessica, myself, and other scientists who have seen the post on social media and are outraged.

      2. Pastor Moerbe is not attacking science as such, but science as a god. Science serves us well in a ministerial role, but not in a magisterial role. Luther in his Large Catechism says that whatever we look to in time of need or for our good is our god. That pretty much describes how many today view science. Science is good when it helps us understand the world God has made. It is worthless when it becomes our god. It is tempting to think that science (or humanism) if you prefer will come up with a pill for every problem. This pandemic has shown the limitations of human knowledge, science, if you will. We have no answer for a tiny virus we can’t see. There is fear because what many people have made their “god” can’t help them any more than Baal responded to his prophets on Mount Carmel. Especially brilliant is Pastoer Moerbe’s observation that we have allowed Darwinism to be taught, in the name of science, that our origin is in chance, chaos and death, yet we also insist that there must be justice and order in the world. Where are all the “science” teachers who teach evolution in their classrooms now? They should be speaking out that this pandemic is just accomplishing what they promote, namely, the “survival of the fittest”? Thank you Pastor Moerbe, for your timely words which serve to keep things in their proper place.

    2. Martin Luther wrote “ Others sin on the right hand. They are much too rash and reckless, tempting God and disregarding everything which might counteract death and the plague. They disdain the use of medicines; they do not avoid places and persons infected by the plague, but lightheartedly make sport of it and wish to prove how independent they are. They say that it is God’s punishment; if he wants to protect them he can do so without medicines or our carefulness. This is not trusting God but tempting him. God has created medicines and provided us with intelligence to guard and take good care of the body so that we can live in good health.” I agree with your points and wish the LCMS would have a better view of today’s current situation.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top